The Roots of Progress

Why “progress studies” is interdisciplinary

When Cowen & Collison coined the term “progress studies” in 2019, some questioned why such a concept was needed, given the existence of economics, history, etc. They argued that an interdisciplinary approach was still useful: “Plenty of existing scholarship touches on these topics, but it takes place in a highly fragmented fashion….”

Recently I’ve been researching and outlining a chapter for my book on the topic of “Can Progress Continue?” I think the full answer to this question is an integration of history, philosophy, and economics. In particular, I’ve found it useful to incorporate:

I think integrating all of these puzzle pieces and perspectives results in the clearest possible answer to this important question, and I think this is true for many other questions of interest to the progress community.

I may receive a commission on purchases made through Amazon links in this post.

Comment: Progress Forum, LessWrong, Reddit

Social media link image credit: Joby Aviation

Get posts by email:

Become a patron

Get posts by email